Friday, May 24, 2013

The National Academy of Air Conditioning


The National Academy of Air Conditioning (NAAC), located on the Upper East Side, is a popular NYC tourist destination, particularly during the summer months. Here are some photos and information about the museum, and some highlights from its photography collection:
The museum contains many "sitting rooms". They are maintained at a range of temperatures from 65 to 82 degrees, in one degree increments, so each person can find the one that is exactly right for them, given their age, and what they happen to be wearing that day.

For the most popular temperatures (69 - 73 degrees), there are three levels of humidity one can choose from.

Friends and Corporate Friends can lounge in these rooms after museum hours for a nominal fee of $5. Patrons are allowed to stay overnight for a $20 fee.



The museum is open year-round. In the winter the A/C units are removed and stored, and the gallery space mainly given over to space heaters and humidifiers.

The museum offers certificate programs in Air Conditioner Repair, HVAC Theory, and Air Conditioner Photography.
Dave Beedon:  "Does the Academy provide dormitory housing for out-of-state students who are studying air conditioner photography?"
Yes - according to the brochure, it is in a nearby building -- a former SRO hotel that was converted by the Academy back in the eighties. I will try to get a picture next time I'm up there.

With funds raised during the "Campaign for the 21st Century", expansion of the museum is underway. Windows will be added to the long-blank north wall, matching those on the other sides. Staff office space will be provided in the new West Tower.


Currently the staff offices are located on 58th street, about a 15 minute walk from the Museum. Because of budgetary constraints, only the Museum Director's office has air conditioning. This encourages the rest of the staff to spend more time working around the Museum.
Dave Beedon:  "Those at the top must be cool to weather the stresses brought on by managing such an important and multi-faceted institution."


The highlight of the museum is its collection of Air Conditioner Photography.

Saturday, May 18, 2013

"They exist in memory."



"Perhaps another color would have been better."

Vera said this about Christo's "Gates" in Central Park. Also, that maybe she would like looking at the pictures of them more than actually walking amongst them.

David said that he loved the Christo's other projects, but that this one he was disappointed in. Too much clunky "gate" and not enough billowing fabric. Also, he was disappointed because he took one incredible picture of the Gates, "the best picture of them all", with his new digital phone, only to discover later that each new picture he took was overwriting the last one.

Gail drew over the second photo and called it "The Skirts". I am very disappointed that Gail is not going to see the Gates for herself. She has a list, and they're not on it, she said. She has her own ideas about things.



My Dad suggested they could recycle the fabric from the Gates into clothes. I told him it was some kind of industrial looking stuff. Perhaps nice waterproof capes for people.

They say it is saffron but it looks orange to me. One little girl interviewed in the Times thought maybe they should have been pale yellow, or a light blue to match her eyes.

I can't really imagine them anything but orange.
                                          §



These photos were taken by my other friend Gail, from a car. She didn't want to walk.

She said, "Seeing them from a slow moving car was like floating, almost like being in a gondola, with no relation to land, where you could spin and turn and see the world floating by. With the horse drawn carriages it made it seem last century and everyone seemed to be on one big adventure, kind of Dickensian for some reason."
                                          §

Some pictures by my friend Craig. We saw the same gates, but he saw them a little differently. So did his camera.
                                          §


I was a skeptic, but the Gates cheered me up as soon as I saw them, and was delighted again at each new turn in the walk. It was like when you come home one day, and someone has strung crepe paper all over the house, because it's your birthday. Everything is transformed.

While individually they are about as interesting as traffic cones, seeing them in their rank and file, with all the people everywhere walking through them ... walking all around the Park ... that's the thing.

What's great is how they are like a big orange highlighter over all the paths in the Park -- the paths are the genius of the Park. You can look out and say, oh, I've walked on that path over there, and in your mind's eye you know what it's like walking on that path, but at the same time you are seeing the whole path in perspective -- that is interesting. I hope I can remember this part of it when the Gates are gone.
                                          §

Rachel was away when the Gates went up. She wrote:

I'M SENDING YOU A VALENTINE, FROM THIS WASTELAND CALLED L.A.
HOW I LONG TO BE IN NEW YORK, WHERE WE WOULD RUN AND PLAY,
AMONGST THE ORANGE IN CENTRAL PARK, OR EVEN IN A BAR,
TO SIP A DRINK AND MUNCH ON NUTS, DIRECTLY FROM THE JAR.
WHATEVER YOUR STATUS BE TODAY, BETWEEN LOVERS, FRIENDS OR
MATES,
JUST KNOW THIS TRUTH, WITHOUT ANY DOUBT, I'D RATHER BE IN
"THE GATES!"

She got back here the day after the official closing, when they were still all up, and said afterwards, "I see what they were talking about."

Either I read it, or a tour guide told me, but it took many many years for the Cristo and Jean Claude to get approval for this project, it was always intended to be in winter so that the color and visibility of them would be best — and plus it would interfere least with everything else that goes on in Central Park — but also, that they would only be up for two weeks, forcing people to visit them in a compressed time period, making for bigger crowds, and a more intense, memorable experience.

My "Gates" Gallery on pBase.

Wednesday, May 15, 2013

“Now you tell me — is he not the cutest creature ever?”



“Now you tell me — is he not the cutest creature ever?”
A bittersweet story, told over six days.   Words and pictures by Betsy Lentz.A big announcement! The baby mallards hatched yesterday! About eight little baby ducklings were up in the nest in the tree with the mommy duck! And then, only hours later, they had all left … except I saw there was one baby left there all by himself. I left him there in case the mommy might come back for him. And then late in the day I saw he was on the ground under the tree. Dave had come home by then and he went to look for the mommy and ducklings so we could try to reunite him with them, but they are nowhere to be found. So, we ended up taking the duckling inside, putting him in a box with a lightbulb for heat. And first thing this morning I went to Agway for duckling food. He’s just as cute as could possibly be! He looks like one of those little “Peeps” (marshmallow chicks) except he has a bill and he’s colored yellow and green(ish). And it’s fascinating to watch him — he jumps around, and grooms himself, and chirps almost nonstop, like a little songbird. And if he sees a fly, he chases it, even though he’s only a day old. I had to encourage him to eat the grain and water I got him, and he’s getting the hang of it now. One issue is that they say the ducklings need water to drink at all times, but if I leave water with him in the box, inevitably he falls in it and gets wet, which they say is not good (he’ll get cold because he doesn’t have his regular feathers yet). In fact, the first time, he fell in the water, got wet, AND couldn’t seem to get up off his back! So I end up just putting him on the floor with me and hanging out with him and helping him drink and eat.
[[MORE]]

“Vulcan Nerve Pinch Thing”
…spending almost all day Friday taking care of the duckling, who we have named Goober (for now). I’m starting to wonder if I really have time for all this responsibility! The thing about Goober is that he wants to be with his mommy or daddy all the time. When we put him in the cage (he’s now in a cat carrier which has a gate in the front), he usually cheeps loudly and throws himself against the cage. In fact last night, all his cheeping and knocking against the cage kept me awake and I had to sleep on the floor in the exercise room (since we don’t have a couch yet). Today, we took Goober outside and he followed us and staring chasing and eating the tiny little bugs that fly low to the ground. It was a lot of work for such a tiny amount of food! Fortunately for Goober, he can stock up on the grain food afterwards. Another cute thing about Goober is how he can be running around catching bugs, but if you pick him up and pet him, he conks out within seconds — it’s like that Vulcan nerve pinch thing! And lots of times he just climbs up into your lap and then into the palm of your hand, and he’ll fall asleep there. He sure is an amazing little creature!

My big dilemma
Goober has the eating and drinking thing down pat now. What ducks do is they eat some food and then have some water and wash it down, so they go back and forth. He’s really packing away the food now! We moved him back into the box from the cat carrier, because he was trying to get through the bars in the cat carrier and we were afraid he would hurt himself. But the box is only a short-term solution because it won’t be long before he can jump out of it. Now when I bring him out of the box in the morning he runs around like mad — he has all this pent-up energy and he’s all excited to be out. As you know, my big dilemma now is that I’ve been doing research on the web, and some of what I’m reading suggests that Goober may be better off if I bring him to a professional rehaber. They know how to raise him and give him the natural foods he would eat (greens, bugs) and I think their goal is to then release him into the wild. Plus, maybe he could be with some other ducklings. I probably should do this for him, but I’m so attached to him now, it makes me cry to think of it!

Six More Cute Things About Goober 

1. When he falls asleep, his eyelids close from the bottom up (so he has lower lids, not upper lids). 2. Whenever I walk away from him, he runs like mad to follow me. 3. He loves to climb up on my lap and go to sleep. Often he crawls up to the crook of my arm and snuggles his face in there, so all I see is his back. 4. He has a repertoire of different chirps: one is three notes going upward (like “do, re, mi”); another is 4 to 6 chirps in a row, all the same note; rarely, he’ll do a single note that raises up or down at the end and therefore is extra cute. There’s probably more but that’s all I’ve isolated. 5. He doesn’t get discouraged when he falls down or slips, which happens all the time. He just gets up, dusts himself off, and starts running or jumping again. 6. He’s very clean — he’s always grooming himself.

You don’t get the full Gooby experience from the pictures 

These are three photos of Gooby on my lap that were taken in quick succession by Dave, and you can see how in the first two he’s awake and the third he’s asleep. That’s how he was, one minute wide awake, the next his eyes shut and his head starts leaning over. One thought I had about the pictures is …You don’t get the full Gooby experience from the pictures. You don’t get the sounds and the movement and the touch. If the picture had sound, you’d hear he’s almost constantly chirping in a soothing manner… bup-bup-bup… bup-bup-bup-bup-bup .. . bup-bup.
It reminds me of purring — in that it reassures you that he’s there and he feels fine. I have no idea if that’s the true purpose of it, but that’s how it makes me feel. Plus you can pet him and he feels warm and soft.

Goober starts his new life (sniff, sniff)

Yesterday, I called a wildlife rehabber who specializes in “waterfowl” and unfortunately she confirmed that Goober would be better off in her care, and with other ducklings, and that I should bring him in “the sooner the better”. I was so sad and said I wasn’t sure if I could bring him in today (meaning yesterday) but I would see, and if not, I could definitely bring him in tomorrow. In reality, I could bring him in right away, I just didn’t want to! Couldn’t I just have one more day? So I hung up and thought it over and heard the words “the sooner the better” ringing in my ears. And also realized it was only going to be harder, the longer I waited. So I called back and said I could bring him in. I put Goober in the cat carrier on a nice soft towel along with his water, and put him in the passenger sear of the car facing me so he could see me, and drove off. He had no problem with the car ride, even though he tended to slide around as I had to stop or accelerate. He was as cute as always. And I tried not to cry, since that would be embarrassing if I was a basket case when I turned him over. The rehabber is near Broadway, NJ, which is on Route 57 (on the way toward Washington), down a long driveway and in a nice woodsy area. When I arrived, I met two young women leaving the place who had just dropped off some mice (not sure why they need rehabbing!) and of course they said how cute Goober was and I told him how great he was and they said “Why are you bringing him in then, why don’t you keep him?” And I almost cried then and there! But I just told them it was better for Goober. Once inside, the rehabber had me fill out paperwork and she put Goober in a wooden box in the back room, with a mirror, which will apparently make him think there’s another duckling there. She said after awhile she would put him with some other ducklings, and then after a couple months (they become adults in a couple months), he would be released to some nice area, possibly to Merrill Creek Reservoir (which I know is really nice and they don’t allow hunting there). I felt sad because I could tell she wasn’t going to interact with Goober and I felt he would be lonely … but the whole point was to get him unattached to humans and to bond with ducks. But still, it was hard to see how living with other ducks could be better than staying with me! But I just have to take it on faith. So the rest of the day, I cried on and off and I think you’re right that this is a sign from Harley that I should get a kitten, because it brought me so much joy to take care of a little creature. I could always get another duckling — a domestic one. But kittens are a lot easier. And of course, I don’t know what ducks are like when they grow up … But maybe I can get a kitten and a duckling! Anyway, I have to remember that Goober would have died Thursday night if it weren’t for us. And that now he has a better chance of survival than any of his siblings, since he’ll be in protective care until he’s grown. So everything is for the best.



It’s hard for me to imagine they could be like Goober 

One thing I couldn’t get a clear answer on was what would happen if we kept him with the intent to care for him for the rest of his life. Rather than with the intent to release him to the wild later (in which case, it was clear he wouldn’t be prepared unless I gave him to a rehaber). I got the impression that somehow he’d be “betwixt and between” (I think that’s an expression) — he’d be drawn to the wild by instinct but drawn to me as his imprinted mother. Like you mentioned, he might be drawn to migrate in the winter but not have the skills to do it. And then he would be in jeopardy. But I wasn’t completely clear on this, and so I’m having all these doubts. But that’s just typical me …always second guessing. But I think you’re right that living his natural life in the wild with other ducks and being able to fly and migrate is pretty exciting. Dave told me one of the teachers at the school who hatches ducklings every year (as a science project) says they’re all totally adorable, but it’s hard for me to imagine they could be like Goober. I’ll have to go visit the ducks they hatch this year to see for myself.                                                                   §Recently had some more adventures in the true Goober spirit. First, a couple weeks ago, Skeesix brought a little garter snake up on the deck and was playing with it. We (Dave) managed to get it away from Skeezy and noticed it seemed to be regurgitating a worm, except it was stuck. So he pulled it out. (Of course, possibly he was trying to swallow the worm, and was now deprived of his meal, but it was the thought that counted). Then he put him on the riverbank and he slithered away. I have retroactively named the snake Sam. Then, last weekend after the record rainfall on Saturday, we discovered a baby squirrel on the ground with his eyes still closed, although he was not that tiny. Initially, I was worried he might be sick and we should stay away. But then, we noticed a second baby squirrel a few feet away, also with eyes closed. Both were moving just a little bit. Initially I was alarmed — was this a mysterious baby squirrel plague? But then Dave hypothesized that the squirrels nest had been flooded and they fell out, and that made more sense. I said we should put the two of them back together so they could snuggle up, which they did. And we put a fallen tree branch over them protectively. And I named them Heckel and Jeckel. Then I located a squirrel rehabilitator (thanks to Goober, I knew how to locate rehabilitators) — at Woodlands Wildlife Refuge (or something like that). She said to put the squirrels in a box with a cloth for warmth and wait to see if the Mom found them; if they weren’t discovered by mom by late afternoon, we should bring them in to rehab. Which is what we ended up doing. The rehabber checked them out and said they looked healthy other than a few abrasions from the fall, and some fleas. At the rehab place, there were skunks, possums, raccoons and even some kind of wildcat.

A bittersweet story, told over six days.   Words and pictures by Betsy Lentz.

A big announcement! The baby mallards hatched yesterday! About eight little baby ducklings were up in the nest in the tree with the mommy duck! And then, only hours later, they had all left … except I saw there was one baby left there all by himself. I left him there in case the mommy might come back for him. And then late in the day I saw he was on the ground under the tree. Dave had come home by then and he went to look for the mommy and ducklings so we could try to reunite him with them, but they are nowhere to be found.

So, we ended up taking the duckling inside, putting him in a box with a lightbulb for heat. And first thing this morning I went to Agway for duckling food.

He’s just as cute as could possibly be! He looks like one of those little “Peeps” (marshmallow chicks) except he has a bill and he’s colored yellow and green(ish). And it’s fascinating to watch him — he jumps around, and grooms himself, and chirps almost nonstop, like a little songbird. And if he sees a fly, he chases it, even though he’s only a day old. I had to encourage him to eat the grain and water I got him, and he’s getting the hang of it now.

One issue is that they say the ducklings need water to drink at all times, but if I leave water with him in the box, inevitably he falls in it and gets wet, which they say is not good (he’ll get cold because he doesn’t have his regular feathers yet). In fact, the first time, he fell in the water, got wet, AND couldn’t seem to get up off his back! So I end up just putting him on the floor with me and hanging out with him and helping him drink and eat.

Vulcan Nerve Pinch Thing

“Vulcan Nerve Pinch Thing”

…spending almost all day Friday taking care of the duckling, who we have named Goober (for now). I’m starting to wonder if I really have time for all this responsibility! The thing about Goober is that he wants to be with his mommy or daddy all the time. When we put him in the cage (he’s now in a cat carrier which has a gate in the front), he usually cheeps loudly and throws himself against the cage. In fact last night, all his cheeping and knocking against the cage kept me awake and I had to sleep on the floor in the exercise room (since we don’t have a couch yet).

Today, we took Goober outside and he followed us and staring chasing and eating the tiny little bugs that fly low to the ground. It was a lot of work for such a tiny amount of food! Fortunately for Goober, he can stock up on the grain food afterwards.

Another cute thing about Goober is how he can be running around catching bugs, but if you pick him up and pet him, he conks out within seconds — it’s like that Vulcan nerve pinch thing! And lots of times he just climbs up into your lap and then into the palm of your hand, and he’ll fall asleep there.

He sure is an amazing little creature!


My big dilemma

Goober has the eating and drinking thing down pat now. What ducks do is they eat some food and then have some water and wash it down, so they go back and forth. He’s really packing away the food now!

We moved him back into the box from the cat carrier, because he was trying to get through the bars in the cat carrier and we were afraid he would hurt himself. But the box is only a short-term solution because it won’t be long before he can jump out of it.

Now when I bring him out of the box in the morning he runs around like mad — he has all this pent-up energy and he’s all excited to be out.

As you know, my big dilemma now is that I’ve been doing research on the web, and some of what I’m reading suggests that Goober may be better off if I bring him to a professional rehaber. They know how to raise him and give him the natural foods he would eat (greens, bugs) and I think their goal is to then release him into the wild. Plus, maybe he could be with some other ducklings. I probably should do this for him, but I’m so attached to him now, it makes me cry to think of it!


Six More Cute Things About Goober

1. When he falls asleep, his eyelids close from the bottom up (so he has lower lids, not upper lids).

2. Whenever I walk away from him, he runs like mad to follow me.

3. He loves to climb up on my lap and go to sleep. Often he crawls up to the crook of my arm and snuggles his face in there, so all I see is his back.

4. He has a repertoire of different chirps: one is three notes going upward (like “do, re, mi”); another is 4 to 6 chirps in a row, all the same note; rarely, he’ll do a single note that raises up or down at the end and therefore is extra cute. There’s probably more but that’s all I’ve isolated.

5. He doesn’t get discouraged when he falls down or slips, which happens all the time. He just gets up, dusts himself off, and starts running or jumping again.

6. He’s very clean — he’s always grooming himself.

You don’t get the full Gooby experience from the pictures

These are three photos of Gooby on my lap that were taken in quick succession by Dave, and you can see how in the first two he’s awake and the third he’s asleep. That’s how he was, one minute wide awake, the next his eyes shut and his head starts leaning over.

One thought I had about the pictures is …You don’t get the full Gooby experience from the pictures. You don’t get the sounds and the movement and the touch. If the picture had sound, you’d hear he’s almost constantly chirping in a soothing manner… bup-bup-bup… bup-bup-bup-bup-bup .. . bup-bup.
It reminds me of purring — in that it reassures you that he’s there and he feels fine. I have no idea if that’s the true purpose of it, but that’s how it makes me feel. Plus you can pet him and he feels warm and soft.

Goober starts his new life (sniff, sniff)

Yesterday, I called a wildlife rehabber who specializes in “waterfowl” and unfortunately she confirmed that Goober would be better off in her care, and with other ducklings, and that I should bring him in “the sooner the better”.

I was so sad and said I wasn’t sure if I could bring him in today (meaning yesterday) but I would see, and if not, I could definitely bring him in tomorrow. In reality, I could bring him in right away, I just didn’t want to! Couldn’t I just have one more day? So I hung up and thought it over and heard the words “the sooner the better” ringing in my ears. And also realized it was only going to be harder, the longer I waited. So I called back and said I could bring him in. I put Goober in the cat carrier on a nice soft towel along with his water, and put him in the passenger sear of the car facing me so he could see me, and drove off. He had no problem with the car ride, even though he tended to slide around as I had to stop or accelerate. He was as cute as always. And I tried not to cry, since that would be embarrassing if I was a basket case when I turned him over.

The rehabber is near Broadway, NJ, which is on Route 57 (on the way toward Washington), down a long driveway and in a nice woodsy area. When I arrived, I met two young women leaving the place who had just dropped off some mice (not sure why they need rehabbing!) and of course they said how cute Goober was and I told him how great he was and they said “Why are you bringing him in then, why don’t you keep him?” And I almost cried then and there! But I just told them it was better for Goober.

Once inside, the rehabber had me fill out paperwork and she put Goober in a wooden box in the back room, with a mirror, which will apparently make him think there’s another duckling there. She said after awhile she would put him with some other ducklings, and then after a couple months (they become adults in a couple months), he would be released to some nice area, possibly to Merrill Creek Reservoir (which I know is really nice and they don’t allow hunting there).

I felt sad because I could tell she wasn’t going to interact with Goober and I felt he would be lonely … but the whole point was to get him unattached to humans and to bond with ducks. But still, it was hard to see how living with other ducks could be better than staying with me! But I just have to take it on faith.

So the rest of the day, I cried on and off and I think you’re right that this is a sign from Harley that I should get a kitten, because it brought me so much joy to take care of a little creature. I could always get another duckling — a domestic one. But kittens are a lot easier. And of course, I don’t know what ducks are like when they grow up … But maybe I can get a kitten and a duckling!

Anyway, I have to remember that Goober would have died Thursday night if it weren’t for us. And that now he has a better chance of survival than any of his siblings, since he’ll be in protective care until he’s grown. So everything is for the best.

It’s hard for me to imagine they could be like Goober

One thing I couldn’t get a clear answer on was what would happen if we kept him with the intent to care for him for the rest of his life. Rather than with the intent to release him to the wild later (in which case, it was clear he wouldn’t be prepared unless I gave him to a rehaber). I got the impression that somehow he’d be “betwixt and between” (I think that’s an expression) — he’d be drawn to the wild by instinct but drawn to me as his imprinted mother. Like you mentioned, he might be drawn to migrate in the winter but not have the skills to do it. And then he would be in jeopardy. But I wasn’t completely clear on this, and so I’m having all these doubts. But that’s just typical me …always second guessing. But I think you’re right that living his natural life in the wild with other ducks and being able to fly and migrate is pretty exciting.

Dave told me one of the teachers at the school who hatches ducklings every year (as a science project) says they’re all totally adorable, but it’s hard for me to imagine they could be like Goober. I’ll have to go visit the ducks they hatch this year to see for myself.

                                                                  §

Recently had some more adventures in the true Goober spirit. First, a couple weeks ago, Skeesix brought a little garter snake up on the deck and was playing with it. We (Dave) managed to get it away from Skeezy and noticed it seemed to be regurgitating a worm, except it was stuck. So he pulled it out. (Of course, possibly he was trying to swallow the worm, and was now deprived of his meal, but it was the thought that counted). Then he put him on the riverbank and he slithered away. I have retroactively named the snake Sam.

Then, last weekend after the record rainfall on Saturday, we discovered a baby squirrel on the ground with his eyes still closed, although he was not that tiny. Initially, I was worried he might be sick and we should stay away. But then, we noticed a second baby squirrel a few feet away, also with eyes closed. Both were moving just a little bit. Initially I was alarmed — was this a mysterious baby squirrel plague? But then Dave hypothesized that the squirrels nest had been flooded and they fell out, and that made more sense. I said we should put the two of them back together so they could snuggle up, which they did. And we put a fallen tree branch over them protectively. And I named them Heckel and Jeckel.

Then I located a squirrel rehabilitator (thanks to Goober, I knew how to locate rehabilitators) — at Woodlands Wildlife Refuge (or something like that). She said to put the squirrels in a box with a cloth for warmth and wait to see if the Mom found them; if they weren’t discovered by mom by late afternoon, we should bring them in to rehab. Which is what we ended up doing. The rehabber checked them out and said they looked healthy other than a few abrasions from the fall, and some fleas. At the rehab place, there were skunks, possums, raccoons and even some kind of wildcat.

Tuesday, May 14, 2013

“I AM big. It’s the PICTURES that got small.”



“I AM big.  It’s the PICTURES that got small.”
Friends have been telling me for years that the Landmark Loews Jersey Theater is “great” and that I really check it out.  And I said, “yeah, I will”,  but didn’t.  It’s like when I go to a movie in a theater myself, and come back and tell my friends that movies were made to be seen in theaters, and then after a couple of weeks I forget that myself and go back to watching them on TV.
But then, the organizer of our Book Club Meetup became pregnant; she temporarily handed over the reins of it to me; “Room 237” opened in NYC; I learned that having one Meetup gets you a second one free, so why not a Stanley Kubrick Meetup?
And then once you have a Kubrick Meetup, you can no longer not go to anything Kubrick.  You HAVE to go.  So, “Paths of Glory” was playing at the Loews.
Like with all “great” experiences, it was unexpected.  Like Kubrick movies.  No one could possibly “expect” them.
[[MORE]]
Journal Square, coming out of the PATH Station, is bleak.  The theater, right across the street, seems so too.  Well, if you are like me, and don’t actually notice anything above street level.


But the moment I stepped inside, shivers ran up my back and I was suddenly happy.
It was like stepping into the entry part of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine — just wow.  Wow.  Then you see beyond that, something much much bigger.  In this case, it was the place where they were going to show the movie.
When the lights go down, it gets really dark — “real country dark” — but you’re still aware of being in a vast place.  There are many rows of heads stretching down in front of you, like pebbles on a beach.  
And then when the screen lights up, it’s like that moment in the planetarium when you cross over from twilight, and there’s an the eerie feeling that they have lifted the roof off and there is nothing between you and the night sky.
While I’ve seen “Paths of Glory” many times, I realized, after a few minutes, that I had never actually seen a 35mm print of it in a theater, and that I’d almost never seen ANY film on a screen as big as this.
And there were some other realizations thereafter:
Even in the new “stadium seating” multiplexes, today’s screens seem nowhere near as big as they were at the old single-screen movie houses.  You no longer think, “it’s SO big!!!” This screen gets you back to that sense of wonder and awe.  And you forget what kind of seat you are sitting in.
Having one gigantic monophonic speaker directly behind the screen, the big sound coming directly FROM the image, and having some echo all around you, like you are in a big cave or cathedral — that’s a lot different, too, from the side stereo speakers and acoustic tiling we’ve gotten used to.  It was kind of uncanny.   Added something extra the cavernous Chateau scenes.  Also when Gerald Fried uses some kind of BIG drum during the Night Patrol scene —a drum that makes some kind of deep note — never noticed it in previous viewings, and never heard anything like it before.  It is what I imagine that “Boom Doom”in the Mines of Mordor would have sounded like.
Paths of Glory is very “talky”.   Somebody is always making a speech.  The words remained the same size as they were for me in past viewing on TV, and kept the same weight and meanings.  The images, though, and the editing, become much more significant, more suggesting, having changing connections to each other, depending on what you notice in the moment.   And you are really “in the moment”, immersed in the images, as if you are in the ocean trying to keep your head above the waves, rather than watching them from the beach.
The old “square” picture framing — “Academy Ratio”? — different from the standard wide screen of today — there’s a lot to be said for it, the emphasis on Tall vs. Wide.  The compositions are more effective, with more tension between elements.
This is lost on small screens: Light / Shadow / Texture /Scale.  They may be there, but you just don’t notice them.  The quality of light, or the import of a gesture.  Like looking at a large format photo print, compared to a 35mm.  It feels like a “deeper” reality.
Editing:  the way one image succeeds another.  Your mind hangs onto to this, like Tarzan swinging from vine to vine.  There’s nothing else to grab onto!   Editing, Kubrick said, was the one thing unique to film-making, and his favorite part of making a movie.  Contrast / Juxtaposition/ Rhythm.  These provoke many associations, from which you can make your own connections, different every time.

Friends have been telling me for years that the Landmark Loews Jersey Theater is “great” and that I really check it out.  And I said, “yeah, I will”,  but didn’t.  It’s like when I go to a movie in a theater myself, and come back and tell my friends that movies were made to be seen in theaters, and then after a couple of weeks I forget that myself and go back to watching them on TV.

But then, the organizer of our Book Club Meetup became pregnant; she temporarily handed over the reins of it to me; “Room 237” opened in NYC; I learned that having one Meetup gets you a second one free, so why not a Stanley Kubrick Meetup?

And then once you have a Kubrick Meetup, you can no longer not go to anything Kubrick.  You HAVE to go.  So, “Paths of Glory” was playing at the Loews.

Like with all “great” experiences, it was unexpected.  Like Kubrick movies.  No one could possibly “expect” them.

Journal Square, coming out of the PATH Station, is bleak.  The theater, right across the street, seems so too.  Well, if you are like me, and don’t actually notice anything above street level.

But the moment I stepped inside, shivers ran up my back and I was suddenly happy.

It was like stepping into the entry part of the Cathedral of St. John the Divine — just wow.  Wow.  Then you see beyond that, something much much bigger.  In this case, it was the place where they were going to show the movie.

When the lights go down, it gets really dark — “real country dark” — but you’re still aware of being in a vast place.  There are many rows of heads stretching down in front of you, like pebbles on a beach.  

And then when the screen lights up, it’s like that moment in the planetarium when you cross over from twilight, and there’s an the eerie feeling that they have lifted the roof off and there is nothing between you and the night sky.

While I’ve seen “Paths of Glory” many times, I realized, after a few minutes, that I had never actually seen a 35mm print of it in a theater, and that I’d almost never seen ANY film on a screen as big as this.

And there were some other realizations thereafter:

Even in the new “stadium seating” multiplexes, today’s screens seem nowhere near as big as they were at the old single-screen movie houses.  You no longer think, “it’s SO big!!!” This screen gets you back to that sense of wonder and awe.  And you forget what kind of seat you are sitting in.

Having one gigantic monophonic speaker directly behind the screen, the big sound coming directly FROM the image, and having some echo all around you, like you are in a big cave or cathedral — that’s a lot different, too, from the side stereo speakers and acoustic tiling we’ve gotten used to.  It was kind of uncanny.   Added something extra to the cavernous Chateau scenes.  Also, when Gerald Fried uses some kind of BIG drum during the Night Patrol scene —a drum that makes some kind of deep note — never noticed it in previous viewings, and never heard anything like it before.  It is what I imagine that “Boom Doom”in the Mines of Mordor would have sounded like.

Paths of Glory is very “talky”.   Somebody is always making a speech.  The words remained the same size as they were for me in past viewing on TV, and kept the same weight and meanings.  The images, though, and the editing, become much more significant, more suggesting, having changing connections to each other, depending on what you notice in the moment.   And you are really “in the moment”, immersed in the images, as if you are in the ocean trying to keep your head above the waves, rather than watching them from the beach.

The old “square” picture framing — “Academy Ratio”? — different from the standard wide screen of today — there’s a lot to be said for it, the emphasis on Tall vs. Wide.  The compositions are more effective, with more tension between elements.

This is lost on small screens: Light / Shadow / Texture /Scale.  They may be there, but you just don’t notice them.  The quality of light, or the import of a gesture.  Like looking at a large format photo print, compared to a 35mm.  It feels like a “deeper” reality.

Editing:  the way one image succeeds another.  Your mind hangs onto to this, like Tarzan swinging from vine to vine.  There’s nothing else to grab onto!   Editing, Kubrick said, was the one thing unique to film-making, and his favorite part of making a movie.  Contrast / Juxtaposition/ Rhythm.  These provoke many associations, from which you can make your own connections, different every time.

Saturday, April 27, 2013

"The Artist is Present"

carlosbaila:
Marina Abramovic meets Ulay
 A friend had gotten me in free to MoMA; I was just going to kill some time there before another event.  Immediately noticing some bright photo lights up on the Atrium, above where I was in the lobby, and being "into" photography at the time, I climbed the stairs towards them.  

There, in the middle of a big empty square space, was a table with two women seated at it, sitting still, facing each other.  And there were three video cameras, and a photographer who had two Canon 1Ds, with REALLY long lenses .  All the gear was trained on the two women.

Around the edge of the square was a crowd of people, sitting and standing, looking at these two women.  So I did too.

One of them had a dramatic red gown on, so I decided she was the principal.  After watching them sitting there for a while, I walked around the edge and found a plaque on the wall that explained the piece.

It said that the artist invited anyone who wished to, to sit down across from her, and then they and her would look at each other quietly, for as long as the person wanted to.  And the artist was going to keep sitting there, every day and every hour that the museum was open, for the 3-month length of the exhibition.  Hence the show's title:  "The Artist is Present". 

So right away that made it more interesting.   There was something compelling about the artist, Marina Abramovic — she had thick black hair in a very long braid — like a gypsy fortune teller, I thought.

I looked away for a moment, and when I looked back, Marina had her head in her hands, and the other woman had walked back to outside the square, where she was gesticulating to her friends in a way that made it seem she had a very intense experience.  Like electric rays had been passing from Marina's eyes into her...  Another woman took her place in the chair, Marina looked up, and the staring began anew...

So, I don't know.  I didn't completely get it.  But it did seem kind of a neat idea.

After a while, I remembered that I had seen signs that the exhibition continued up on a higher floor.   Up there,  it was a retrospective of her career as a performance artist from the 70's 'till now.
I got totally caught up in her story!     Here is an early piece where she brushed her hair for an hour, saying "Art is Beautiful, Artist Must be Beautiful"... 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_VxR3TUdoU&feature=related 

It said on a label that she would think of different things she could do, and the one that scared her the most, invariably that would be the one she would end up doing....  such as this one:

Rhythm 0, 1974

To test the limits of the relationship between performer and audience, Abramovic developed one of her most challenging (and best-known) performances. She assigned a passive role to herself, with the public being the force which would act on her.
Abramovic had placed upon a table 72 objects that people were allowed to use (a sign informed them) in any way that they chose. Some of these were objects that could give pleasure, while others could be wielded to inflict pain, or to harm her. Among them were scissors, a knife, a whip, and, most notoriously, a gun and a single bullet. For six hours the artist allowed the audience members to manipulate her body and actions.
Initially, members of the audience reacted with caution and modesty, but as time passed (and the artist remained impassive) several people began to act quite aggressively. As Abramovic described it later:
“The experience I learned was that…if you leave decision to the public, you can be killed.” ... “I felt really violated: they cut my clothes, stuck rose thorns in my stomach, one person aimed the gun at my head, and another took it away. It created an aggressive atmosphere. After exactly 6 hours, as planned, I stood up and started walking toward the public. Everyone ran away, escaping an actual confrontation.”

*******************************

At MoMA, they had the table with all that stuff laid out on it.  They also had live performers re-enacting some of Marina's old pieces, sometimes in the nude, which — I just couldn't care about them, because I had become smitten with Marina by this point — but here's an article about that part...

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/16/arts/design/16public.html

One thing I really liked was that Marina gave a performance every year on her birthday; it was part of her artistic philosophy to do so.  And she was doing it in a different city, and she met this guy who was also doing a performance, because it was HIS birthday!  

They were the same age, born the same day, doing the same thing. So from then on they were inseparable, and performed as a male/female pair.  His name was Ulay...  here is a typical thing they did together that was reenacted by other people at MoMA:

http://catalogue.nimk.nl/art_play.php?id=7094

And here is a scarier piece....

http://catalogue.nimk.nl/art_play.php?id=1827

And another thing they did was "Nightsea Crossing", where they would sit across a table from each other, at different cities, and sit still for 7 hours.  This was actually a terribly painful and maddening thing to do.    Ulay would sometimes have to quit, but Marina never would.

They were together for 12 years, but sadly, they broke up.  The way they broke up was to walk from opposite ends of the great wall of China and meet in the middle.  Where they said goodbye.   Marina was crying (of course they videotaped the whole thing) and I felt very sorry for them.  They were soul-mates!   

The next room continued with her post-Ulay work, which usually involved some act of deprivation or endurance, such as when she lived on public display in a Soho gallery for 11 days ... 

http://www.skny.com/exhibitions/2002-11-15_marina-abramovi/ 

So. I go back downstairs. But NOW, Marina is like a movie star to me.   I got hit with the impact of her whole career's vision out of the blue, in two hours.  

I have time to watch her for another hour before I have to go ... and because I am sitting there for a while, I notice the other people who are staying still, watching, like me.  

I see this one vaguely familiar-looking guy leaning up against the opposite wall, just outside of Marina's field of view. Suddenly I think -- could it be?  Is it Ulay?   Has he come back, finally, to see Marina recreate their greatest performance, maybe to recreate it together?  That's the thought I go out with ... and that night, I find the rest of the story....

http://www.artinfo.com/news/story/34097/present-and-past/

I miss living in NYC!

Friday, April 26, 2013

"Arachnophobia": Some Spiders Don't Take Getting Squashed Lying Down

One lovely morning, in the peaceful country town of Canaima, California…in front of an attractive old farm-house… down kerplops a crow! Fell right out of the sky! Dead!

Next, up pulls a station wagon, and out piles the handsome, fair-haired Jennings family from nearby San Francisco, eager to move into their new dream home. They are Ross Jennings (Jeff Daniels), a doctor, his wife Molly (Harley Jean Kozak), and their two kids.

Dr. Jennings does have this one personality quirk: because of a childhood trauma, he has “arachnophobia’—the fear of spiders.

Meanwhile, creeping off the nearby dead crow, eager to move into his new dream home—the barn—is “Big Bob”: a huge, hairy, horrifying tarantula, coming to us directly from a just-discovered prehistoric sinkhole in Venezuela, some 4,125 miles away as the crow flew (actually, Bob took a plane most of the way).

This incredible happenstance might be both funny-peculiar and funny-ha-ha, since “Arachnophobia” is billed as a “thrill-omedy”. But what it portends is: within two months all the crickets in Canaima stop chirping; several locals die of apparent heart attacks; and finally, there is Dr. Jennings poking around in his cellar, hyper-ventilating, with a homemade flame-thrower consisting of a can of spray-paint and a Bic Flic, which he fires off frantically at any moving shadow—and they all seem to be moving!

This traumatic physician-heal-thyselfing seems a bit much—why not just give him a regular, healthy fear of spiders, like the rest of us? I myself have since adopted a squish first, ask questions later policy, there is a rolled up newspaper within reach right now, ready to smash any UMO’s (unidentified moving objects) that appear.

Studies have shown that a spider’s scariness is geometrically proportional to the thickness of its legs, and Big Bob’s plump drumsticks would give anyone the leaping heebies. He somehow mates with a harmless little California spider his first night in town, and their many offspring have thinner but nimbler limbs, allowing them to quickly disperse through town, climbing up steps, scuttling under doorways and across walls, and sometimes catapulting off ceilings. They crawl into coffee cups, shoes, blankets, football helmets, and shower drains. One even becomes an unwelcome premium in a box of breakfast flakes.

The moviemakers worried about keeping us too tense for too long, so they cast John Goodman (of ABC’s Roseanne) as an eccentric exterminator.

“We needed to have somebody who the audience knows is a funny guy. When they see his name, they feel that this movie will be okay,” says director Frank Marshall (“Shot by Shot”, Premiere, 7/90). Also, though, he thought it “was very important to have it totally believable —so I used real spiders throughout the movie.” (“Thrills, Chills and Spiders”, WPIX, 7/23/90).

Entomologists may find the most comic relief in “Arachnophobia”. Their on-screen proxy, Dr. James Atherton (the dashing Julian Sands), collects specimens by blasting trees with insecticide and raking up the bodies—yet later on he insists that dead spiders are no good to study; Dr. Jennings must find him a live one.

When a member of his expedition dies suddenly, and his corpse wears an expression of supreme terror, Atherton dismisses it as “jungle fever”. When, at night, alone, looking for the poisonous Big Bob, he finds a web as big as a circus net in the Jennings’ barn, he strums the trigger thread playfully and says, “Come out, Mr. Spider, dinner’s ready.” He’s not even wearing gloves!!!

Just as using real spiders doesn’t guarantee believability, nor is simply casting John Goodman enough for the funniness—they didn’t give him enough funny things for him to say and do.

Also, the spiders are lousy actors —in their closeups, you can tell they don’t know who they’re supposed to bite, where they’re supposed to go, or anything.

Those legs definitely put the chill on you, though, and there’s so many spiders that when you try to go to sleep that night, they’ll still be swimming in front of your eyes.

Daniels and Kozak are attractive performers; the set design and cinematography are high quality; and on all counts, if you are wanting a spider movie, “Arachnophobia” is way better than “Kingdom of the Spiders”, “The Giant Spider Invasion”, or even “Earth Versus The Spider”.

The opening sequence, shot on location in the awesome Venezuelan mountains, is wonderful—there’s this one shot of two blue parrots swooping in front of a green background that I’d love to have framed —we hate to see the expedition leave this amazing place. Maybe they should have stayed in the sinkhole, giving Big Bob the home court advantage, and had Daniels and Kozak along on the expedition as the pilot and a free-lance photographer respectively. She could be initially attracted to the dashing Sands, and the timid Daniels would have to prove himself, and —ahhhhhh! [SMASH] Oops, sorry, thought I saw something moving!

— R. Rube; article first published in Hunterdon County Review, 1990
image

Tuesday, April 23, 2013

“Can you HONESTLY say you’ve read the owner’s manual?”

I have used my iPod shuffle most every day since I’ve had it — probably five years now — in fact, I’ve become totally dependent on it for a sense of companionship — but before last night, I thought you couldn’t fast forward or rewind in a track — that the Forward Arrow could only “Chapter Skip” to the beginning of the next track.  Which is OK for songs, but a real pain when listening to a 60-minute podcast, and then accidentally knock the Forward Arrow button when still only half way through it — and so you have to start back at the beginning, and re-listen to the whole thing to get back to where you were.

Well, last night I finally figured it out — you just have to hold the Forward Arrow DOWN for a couple of seconds, then it skims forward rather than skipping to the next piece.  SO simple.

The owner’s manual is only a one-sided little card with 10 lines of text on it; I saved it on my bulletin board all these years with the intention of studying it one day, but I never did  — I just ASSuMEd my Shuffle was too small to have this "bonus"-type feature.  Or if it did, that maybe it was explained on some larger owner's manual that I had not noticed and threw out with the packaging.

 Also, rather than really looking at that little card, I did a Google Search a couple of years ago, and it did find an answer, but the way it came across to me was “first you have to hold this one button down for five seconds, then you have to tap on another button, and then it will work. “  I always thought I would find that answer again someday when I have time and really figure it out.

So last night on the train, I really didn’t want to go back and re-listen to all of This American Life to find out how this one story turned out… and with  the strength of knowing that what I wanted to do was at least theoretically possible, I looked at the thing carefully, and saw there were only three buttons:  Play, Forward Arrow, Reverse Arrow.  Of the three, it was probably something to do with the Forward Arrow.  I decided to just try holding it down...

PS:  Well, it’s a few days later, and I was about to start listening to my $1 audiobook version of Anna Karenina.  (It turned out to be the same version I had rented  for about $60 on cassettes twenty-five years ago.) But, each section of  the book is seven hours long, and even with my new Fast Forward capability, I didn’t want to be FF’ing through the first five hours if I accidentally knocked a button while jogging.

It occurred to me that if the Shuffle had a FF feature, it stood to reason it would also have a Hold feature — even my old Discman had that.  So, Googled it, and Bam!   “Hold down the play button for 3 seconds and the light will blink yellow.  Hold it down for 3 seconds again to Release Hold.”

Did it, works PERFECT!

PPS: Just checked my Bulletin Board to see if I could find the little Owner’s Manual card to try to confirm that the above information was there all along, but it has kind of gotten buried under similar things (“to look at later”) that were thumb-tacked on after.  So I guess I'll never know.